I was reflecting today on how much emotions can impact our ability to learn. A past experience where I had been in conflict with my lecturer, and had a bit of a mild 'slap on the wrist' made it impossible for me to concentrate throughout a seminar later that day. I spent the whole 2 hours replaying the conversation, wondering if she was still angry, wondering if she was avoiding eye contact on purpose and not coming to my group because of what happened. Really exhausting and stress levels running high throughout. My recollection of the content of the seminar was patchy to say the least when I reviewed the notes - I simply didn't have the head space to learn and do all that emotional analysis.
It was good to remember this - gives an insight into what some of the pupils at school may be experiencing. Some of the pupils in my class have experienced bullying, bereavement of a parent, being a looked after child, or a total recent change of culture and a new language - way more stressful than my mild incident.
Tuesday, 6 March 2012
Wednesday, 22 February 2012
SHOUTING!
Sitting in the English base on a free
period I hear for the third time today a teacher outside shouting at a
student. Really shouting angrily,
nastily, in their face. I’ve hear this
from two other teachers too and I never want to become like this. I do occasionally shout – always at home,
always at my kids (although when I lived with my mum I did occasionally shout
at her and my sister), always in extreme anger, and I always apologise
afterwards because it’s never a good strategy to get what I want, more just an
outpouring of rage. Shouting is
intimidating, threatening, and in my opinion on the spectrum of violent
behaviour. I’ve never shouted at anyone in my previous professional life. I would HATE someone to do that to me, and if
they had I’d probably put in a formal complaint. So why is it seen as totally acceptable to do
this to young people? Granted, they had
usually really stepped out of line, and often been very rude. But we teachers are supposed to be modelling
how to behave.
Exploring this with my mentor they said
that the teachers are using shouting in an unemotional way – that it is all a
show and they aren’t actually as angry as they sound. I was recommended to try it out, to try this
out as a kind of ‘personna’ from time to time, because, my mentor said, with
some kids it’s the only way they will comply and it’s an effective behaviour
management strategy. I am not going to.
It is not ‘me’. But what worries me is that being in a culture where
this is seen as completely acceptable that I may start to think this is ok too,
that I will lose my perspective and become a shouty teacher and abuse my
power.
I am very taken with Lee Cantor’s positive
behaviour management, the use of rewards and clear, progressive sanctions. I understand that tone of voice can be very
effective – as a parent I have found this very effective. What I like about this is it keeps the
relationship with the pupil intact, and means that even after a warning for
negative behaviour, there is room for positive rewards in the same lesson, and
overall the balance should be more on the positive. At Jordanhill we have been given a lot of
information and support to use this approach to behaviour. Speaking to another, fairly new teacher (who
also studied at Jordanhill) I am encouraged that he has a different opinion,
and doesn’t use shouting himself because he’s not found it effective, but finds
the positive work much better for him.
I’ve no doubt that in my future career I’ll
occasionally feel really angry with the kids I teach. I will encounter really difficult behaviour
and it’ll feel like nothing is working.
I really hope that in those situations I can still treat people how I’d
like to be treated.
Saturday, 11 February 2012
Technology in schools
Last week's English class was on ICT and we were shown how to use a basic word processor as a way of engaging a class interactively in language analysis. It showed that even with just word available on the projected screen (and no interactive whiteboard) we can still be interactive in teaching English. We learnt some nifty shortcuts and ways of deconstructing language in a poem, analysing the structure etc through building a poetry wall. A couple of nice starters in the bag with some very simple technology.
At the other end of the spectrum are ipads. Islay Academy has given up on interactive whiteboards (which cost £1,000 each) in favour of ipads for every pupil. Its saving them loads on their photocopying budget every year, not to mention the savings on installing smartboards in every class (although I'd like to see their electricity bill with all these devices recharging their batteries off the mains). This opens up a world of possibility, as long as the teachers know how to use the technology. Two examples: as a researching tool for persuasive essays, discursive essays- each person has what they need in front of them. Collaborative documents are a way of group discussion in a different way, much like instant messaging, meaning that more people can contribute to the discussion than a talk based discussion (where only one person can talk at a time). The technology can really enable learning.
In my last school the teachers all had interactive whiteboards and only two teachers used them interactively - most were using them are data projectors and projecting word documents. They maintained that the problem was that teachers were not given any training on how to use the technology available. The ones who were braver at trying out and more intuitively exploring the whiteboards worked out how to use them - but even these were mainly using them as glorified flip chart with some extra rulers etc. Hope that I take the leap and try and utilise their potential a bit more. I'll add it to the ever increasing to do list...
At the other end of the spectrum are ipads. Islay Academy has given up on interactive whiteboards (which cost £1,000 each) in favour of ipads for every pupil. Its saving them loads on their photocopying budget every year, not to mention the savings on installing smartboards in every class (although I'd like to see their electricity bill with all these devices recharging their batteries off the mains). This opens up a world of possibility, as long as the teachers know how to use the technology. Two examples: as a researching tool for persuasive essays, discursive essays- each person has what they need in front of them. Collaborative documents are a way of group discussion in a different way, much like instant messaging, meaning that more people can contribute to the discussion than a talk based discussion (where only one person can talk at a time). The technology can really enable learning.
In my last school the teachers all had interactive whiteboards and only two teachers used them interactively - most were using them are data projectors and projecting word documents. They maintained that the problem was that teachers were not given any training on how to use the technology available. The ones who were braver at trying out and more intuitively exploring the whiteboards worked out how to use them - but even these were mainly using them as glorified flip chart with some extra rulers etc. Hope that I take the leap and try and utilise their potential a bit more. I'll add it to the ever increasing to do list...
Saturday, 28 January 2012
Happy Beginnings
This is a happy teacher-to-be. Last minute changes meant that instead of last weeks 50 mile, 2 hour commute, which improved to a 27 mile, 1 1/2 hour commute, changed on Thursday to a 1 mile, 20 minute walk. The school is a mixed large urban non-denominational school. I did some observation and teaching assistance there in August 2010, so there were some familiar faces and a very warm welcome which I was delighted at. The visit was very short - they heard so late about my arrival that there was no timetable etc, so I'm doing my day visit next week instead. The only down side is that I know a lot of the children there (and am closely related to one first year), which ups the stakes a bit. Luckily she is not too bothered by my being there.
Learning this week: lots of learning about assessment, formative and summative. Boy, does it take me ages to mark work - I'm seriously going to have to get faster or I may have to give up sleeping altogether, or invent a time machine.
Learning this week: lots of learning about assessment, formative and summative. Boy, does it take me ages to mark work - I'm seriously going to have to get faster or I may have to give up sleeping altogether, or invent a time machine.
Sunday, 22 January 2012
Placement headache
Placement two is looming - our day visit is next Friday, which should be something to look forward to. However, zero placements have been offered to students of English in the East Coast, which means I have been offered a placement school 50 miles away (a 2 hour journey involving a bus, two trains, and a walk). AAAArgh! How is THAT going to work? As a parent of two school aged kids that's a BIG ask from my partner, who has already shouldered a lot of extra domestic duties during the course of my 'travels in teacher territory'.
Not sure what I've learned from this. Is this a sign that schools feel overwhelmed, too busy to help a student teacher just before the prelims start? Perhaps the East Coast teacher training college has snaffled all the willing schools up, and have better timing (their students started placement 2 in January). It's a worry that institutions dedicated to learning are not willing to support the learning of their colleagues.
Not sure what I've learned from this. Is this a sign that schools feel overwhelmed, too busy to help a student teacher just before the prelims start? Perhaps the East Coast teacher training college has snaffled all the willing schools up, and have better timing (their students started placement 2 in January). It's a worry that institutions dedicated to learning are not willing to support the learning of their colleagues.
Monday, 16 January 2012
Blogging dillemmas and questions...
At the first ICT option class last Friday our tutor was talking about
the value of blogging as a good way of teasing out thoughts, clarifying
opinions and testing ideas within a supportive group of fellow educators who
will question and challenge these thoughts, opinions and ideas. As I was
writing that first blog entry to share with the rest of the class I immediately
felt a little bit vulnerable – my thoughts, opinions, ideas were going to be
laid bare for people to comment on, for them to judge. What if I came out with something
totally off the wall, or badly thought through?
It would be there in black and white (forever, according to the GTC).
Later that evening I was with a friend who
works in local government, who was saying how careful he has to be about what
he writes online. He has had direct experience of vitriolic personal attacks
for his actions as a councillor, or for his political views, which are posted
after anything he publishes online. Just read the bile that is brought forth on the
Scotsman online comments (who take the view that the comments are moderated by ‘the
people’ ie if no-one complains then comments can stay) and you'll get a flavour. We do not live in a culture where in politics
it is even remotely acceptable not to have an instant opinion on anything, and
it is always seen as a weakness if you change your mind. And it’s not just politicians. Rory Lamont was
all over the papers this week for using Twitter to express his political opinions (albeit
in sweary language).
How do we protect ourselves from horrible comments about
what we write?
How do we gauge what is acceptable for public view?
How do we protect pupils from getting horrible comments if
they make a blog? Would they have to set
up a moderator for their blogs, or only invite certain people to read it (in
which case they’d lose the possibility of connecting with the world)?
We were given links to educational blogs that Primary
schools have developed such as Sandaig
Primary blog or Mrs
Vass's class blogs. I’ve also been taken aback a bit with the level of
information that a stranger could get from viewing these class blogs. Although they do not use surnames, it would be
fairly easy to use the information to trick a child into thinking you knew
their parents for example. One kid, in P6,
wrote about her holiday, when she went to x, y and Z, who with etc. Pictures of her as a baby, of her with their dad, info
about their family are viewable online through this ‘safe’ web. From a child
protection point of view there is a huge amount here that someone could use to
groom a child.
How far should we go to keeping identities safe?
Is it a
risk that kids just have to learn how to manage? – ie if you’ve not seen them
meet your dad, don’t believe that they actually ARE a pal, and tell someone.
Is there enough out there to educate children about keeping
safe online? (The only resource I know is
ThinkUKnow, which is quite good).
Saturday, 14 January 2012
So, at the end of the the first week back at college, and now 17 weeks completed (very nearly at the halfway point) what has been going round my head this week?
Firstly, following a lecture and tutorial on the philosophy of education, I've confirmed that I'm still a hippy at heart, totally in line with the philosophy of Summerhill School, and longing for more schools to be like that, and opportunities for that kind of education to be available for those who could never afford it. Curious to see how any of its principles and approaches could be used in a mainstream school. I just love the simple message that schools should be places of happiness; that happier children = happier adults = happier world because most crime and bad stuff is done by unhappy people. Of course happiness would be born out of a world of justice too in my philosophy.
Secondly, that there are lots and lots of great non-fiction books I have read that I had never considered studying with pupils at school, which I'm very excited about. I love the potential to engage students in what they are interested, which may not be Victorian Gothic literature, but could be travel or true crime literature.
Third, that I'm getting a bit anxious at the prospect of even more marking coming the way of English teachers under the new arrangements for National 4 and National 5, and the new literacy assessments that are done in S3.
And had lots of thoughts about blogs and sharing thoughts on a public forum. This blog is happening as part of a homework task in an ICT option I've taken this term. More on that to follow...
Third, that I'm getting a bit anxious at the prospect of even more marking coming the way of English teachers under the new arrangements for National 4 and National 5, and the new literacy assessments that are done in S3.
And had lots of thoughts about blogs and sharing thoughts on a public forum. This blog is happening as part of a homework task in an ICT option I've taken this term. More on that to follow...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)